Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ya, and I thought the LUG was a tough audience. I hope that guy doesn't come after me, he might take away my PhotoShop license! SonC - ----- Original Message ----- From: "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 8:27 AM Subject: RE: [Leica] Photo scandal at National Geographic!!! > Wow! Someone has WAY too much time on their hands! (Which is not in any > way to defend the Geographic if the photo was faked/doctored or is not > what it is purported to be.) ;-) > > B. D. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Dan C > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 8:12 AM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Photo scandal at National Geographic!!! > > > Was it really a fake bird on the cover? I was only able to read the > first > part of the article at the link, but what I did read reminded me > (perhaps very unfairly) of all those "scientific" arguements "proving" > that the Apollo moon walks were faked. > > But like I said, I may be being completely unfair, since I didn't read > the > article!!! Did National Geographic respond to the allegations? > > Dan C. > > At 06:55 AM 28-08-03 -0500, Don R. wrote: > >National Geographic is having its share of problems starting with Peter > >(Baghdad) Arnett and then the fake bird gracing the cover. > > > >Does anyone know exactly who blew the whistle on the fake bird episode? > > > > >> http://www.naturephoto.hu/home/index.html > >> -- > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html