Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] National Geographic scandal
From: Seth Rosner <sethrosner@direcway.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 10:49:12 -0400
References: <200308301123.HAA22000@poseidon.proxymedia.net> <3F50A87A.90707@ldp.com>

someone with Nat'l Geo's email address ought to send this traffic to them.
As a child, adolescent and young guy, I traveled the world, visited people I
otherwise could not even imagine, saw fauna and flora as from another
planet, all because my mom subscribed since before I could remember. And
insisted that I read and observe.

Haven't done so in years, no decades. Would much rather remember the quality
I recall as a kid.

Seth            LaK 9

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rolfe Tessem" <rolfe@ldp.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] National Geographic scandal


> Emanuel Lowi wrote:
> >>I was a long-time subscriber to National Geographic but cancelled my
> >>subscription this past year for two reasons. First, I feel that the
> >>quality of the pictures in the magazine has declined dramatically over
> >>the past number of years. I can't put my finger on when it happened, but
> >>over the past decade there has been a definite deterioration.
> >
> >
> > Dramatically reduced time allowed for the photographers to shoot the
stories -- in
> > many cases about 25% of what used to be permitted. Far less $ spent on
each
> > assignment too (used to tally up to $100K per story for photos alone).
Something's
> > gotta give.
>
> Right.
>
> And in my case, what gave was my willingness to put up with what has
> become mediocre quality at best. It is important for people to speak
> with their dollars or management will draw the conclusion that it can
> cut the story budget by 75% and nobody will notice.
>
> The writing, IMHO, was always terrible but one put up with it for the
> quality of the photography. Now they are equally bad. If you saw the
> rows and rows of offices in the National Geo building filled with people
> doing essentially nothing, you would be even more outraged.
>
> Rolfe
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Emanuel Lowi" <mano@proxyma.net> ([Leica] National Geographic scandal)
Message from Rolfe Tessem <rolfe@ldp.com> (Re: [Leica] National Geographic scandal)