Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] PJ standards
From: "Jack McLain" <jmclainaz@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 06:31:34 -0700
References: <E5B3554C-DC7C-11D7-84A7-003065BAFBD0@jphotog.com>

*snip*

> On the other hand, if it doesn't let them photograph stupid "photo ops"
> such as  a presidential candidate driving a tank, or a president
> teaching sunday school, we can only benefit. Give the candidates NO
> coverage except real life, and maybe the pubic would be better informed
> on how the government works. Political Flacks might be out of a job,
> but that's a small price to pay for a better informed pubic. But the
> candidates and politicians know they can manipulate news coverage
> because editors don't have the nerve to force the issue.

But... isn't polititians acting silly also news, and isn't the exposure of
this behavior relevent to good decision making by a voter.  It seems to me
that you are being a bit elitist and selling short the ability of the public
to make the distinction between spontaniety and cynical staging.

cheers
Jack McLain
Tucson, AZ
http://jackmclain-photography.dotcommunity.net

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] PJ standards)