Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Feli I have tried the Noctilux on my M3 and M2. No question, the M3 is better. But I still got rid of the Noctilux in favor of my Summilux. Jerry Feli di Giorgio wrote: > On Sunday, Sep 7, 2003, at 18:05 US/Pacific, Don Dory wrote: > > > Feli, > > Unless your M6 is a 0.58 then the 50 lines are the same as the M2. > > I'm not so sure of that...I'm sitting here looking through them as we > speak, eh- write. > My M6TTL is also a .72 and the 50 framelines are a little tighter than > on the M2 > and it's not just because the frame lines are a little thinner. > > > Or > > possibly you are referring to the lines for the 75 on the M6. If you > > can live without a meter there is no better camera for a Noct than an > > M3. Without a doubt the best finder for no DOF lenses. Especially if > > you use the 1.25 focusing accuracy is superb. > > > > Sorry to add a camera to your equipment list. > > > > Don Dory, you are an evil, evil man. > 8-) > > feli > > > Don > > dorysrus@mindspring.com > > > > _______________________________________________________ > They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary > safety > deserve neither liberty nor safety. -Benjamin Franklin > > feli2@earthlink.net > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html