Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I very clearly heard ELMAR, not SUMMILUX Gregoire - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Johnny Deadman" <lists@johnbrownlow.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 12:08 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] new leica-M lens news > 90 f/1.4 could be misheard and would make sense. > > On Thursday, September 18, 2003, at 05:27 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > > > I'm not buying (believing) the "90 F4 with goggles" rumor because if > > they went f4 it would be for compactness and they would not want the > > goggles which would ruin that. Some thought the 2.8 135 was ruined by > > the goggles. If they only had that 1.2 screw in thing for the eyepiece > > those days. > > > > > > Also they WOULD need the goggles for extra high speed lenses for more > > accuracy this is the opposite case. > > > > No this is another stupid rumor. I guess you've got this in writing so > > somebodies going to say "i told you so" and i think I'm right and I've > > been pretty lucky so far. > > > > > > > > Mark Rabiner > > Portland, Oregon USA > > http://www.rabinergroup.com > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > > > -- > John Brownlow > > http://www.pinkheadedbug.com > http://www.unintended-consequences.com > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.518 / Virus Database: 316 - Release Date: 13/09/2003 - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html