Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re[4]: [Leica] Kodak Focus (Now Troll)
From: Sonny Carter <sonc@sonc.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 19:07:55 -0700
References: <410-22003952623914676@earthlink.net> <5.2.0.9.0.20030926185847.00b29ba8@pop.runbox.com>

Hello Jeffery,

Good catch!


Friday, September 26, 2003, 4:59:03 PM, you wrote:

JS> No, that's the next DAY'S cake.

JS> At 09:39 PM 9/25/2003 -0500, you wrote:

>>Will the finder of the plastic baby have to buy next years cake?? :) jh
>>
>> > [Original Message]
>> > From: Sonny Carter <sonc@sonc.com>
>> > To: Afterswift@aol.com <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
>> > Date: 9/25/2003 6:54:22 PM
>> > Subject: Re[2]: [Leica] Kodak Focus (Now Troll)
>> >
>> > Hello Afterswift,
>> >
>> > I work in a research center, I am able to find information because it
>> > is my job.   You posted an incorrect definition of troll. I merely
>> > corrected that definition.
>> >
>> > We have a saying here in Louisiana, I think it might be regional; "The
>> > chicken who cackles loudest is the one who laid the egg."
>> >
>> > Did I piss you off with that definition?  It was not mine. I do not
>> > seek to be hurtful.  I have advised you on list and off list that folks
>> > feel you are acting troll-like.
>> >
>> > It was in kindness that I first emailed you, then exasperation, but
>> > you are the pit-bull of trollers. You do take the cake.
>> >
>> > Send me your snail mail address, and I will send you a certificate.
>> >
>> > Sonny
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thursday, September 25, 2003, 4:11:51 PM, you wrote:
>> >
>> > Aac> In a message dated 9/25/03 1:35:13 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
>>sonc@sonc.com
>> > Aac> writes:
>> >
>> > >> 2.  An individual who chronically trolls in sense 1; regularly posts
>> > >>  specious arguments, flames or personal attacks to a newsgroup,
>>discussion
>> > >>  list, or in email for no other purpose than to annoy someone or
>>disrupt a
>> > >>  discussion. Trolls are recognizable by the fact that the have no real
>> > >>  interest in learning about the topic at hand - they simply want to
>>utter
>> > >>  flame bait. Like the ugly creatures they are named after, they
>>exhibit no
>> > >>  redeeming characteristics, and as such, they are recognized as a
>>lower form
>> > >>  of life on the net, as in, "Oh, ignore him, he's just a troll."
>> > Aac> --------------
>> > Aac> Are you such a one? You seem to know the subject intimately.
>> > Aac> My objective to find things out. It seems I have found you out.
>> > Aac> Methinks you protest too much.
>> >
>> > Aac> br
>> > Aac> --
>> > Aac> To unsubscribe, see
>> > Aac> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best regards,
>> >  Sonny                            mailto:sonc@sonc.com
>> >
>> > --
>> > To unsubscribe, see
>> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>>
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, see
>>http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

JS> --
JS> To unsubscribe, see
JS> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html



- -- 
Best regards,
 Sonny                            mailto:sonc@sonc.com

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "James Harrison" <leicajh@earthlink.net> (RE: Re[2]: [Leica] Kodak Focus (Now Troll))
Message from Jeffery Smith <jls@runbox.com> (RE: Re[2]: [Leica] Kodak Focus (Now Troll))