Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/10/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Is digital photography necrophilia?
From: "Jim Laurel" <jplaurel@nwlink.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 13:31:08 -0700
References: <004c01c395ab$41a75f20$0264a8c0@CCA4A5EF37E11E>
 
Phew, finally a response from the LUGs own digital acolyte.  I was worried
something happened to you when took more than a 24 hours to respond, B.D.!

All in fun...  ;-)

- --Jim

B. D. Colen wrote:
> In response to Dante's anti-digital diatribe -
>
> Sorry, Dante, but this is precisely what you've labled it - a rant, and
> like most rants it is far more a rhetorical exercise than a rational
> discussion of an important topic.

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies: Reply from Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net> (Re: [Leica] Is digital photography necrophilia?)
 In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] Is digital photography necrophilia?)