Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/10/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Is digital photography necrophilia?
From: Rolfe Tessem <rolfe@ldp.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:57:19 -0400
References: <20031020161444.22560.qmail@web14407.mail.yahoo.com> <3F94176E.9040504@ldp.com> <002001c39733$da7f54d0$ea40b8c7@nsula.edu>

Sonny Carter wrote:

> Rolfe, I just went to the topics index, and with the exception of about
> fifty postings relating to the anti-digital photo contest, and around 30
> about scanners and printers, (which I consider on topic), another 30 were
> about the new leica-lensed Panasonic, which will probably be the Digilux 2.
> The other 1100 some odd posts did not seem to be digital; a good deal less
> than 10%. Count them yourself!

Sonny,

You've been on the LUG long enough to know that the topic headings bear, 
at best, a passing relationship to what the thread is actually about. 
Especially long threads :-).

I also consider scanners and printers on topic, BTW.

Rolfe

- -- 
Rolfe Tessem      |     Lucky Duck Productions, Inc.
rolfe@ldp.com     |     96 Morton Street
(212) 463-0029    |     New York, Ny 10014

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Jeff S <four_season_photo@yahoo.com> (Re: [Leica] Is digital photography necrophilia?)
Message from Rolfe Tessem <rolfe@ldp.com> (Re: [Leica] Is digital photography necrophilia?)
Message from "Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com> (Re: [Leica] Is digital photography necrophilia?)