Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Flare-resistant Leica wide angle lenses
From: robertmeier@usjet.net
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 11:42:23 -0600
References: <200311270052.QAA16792@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <13ec01c3b49a$2da5cdf0$22df7d80@KRIEGERLPT> <2fpesvkfsultmob4a29tuhl91fj08tjcrl@4ax.com> <09a501c3b5c9$f88c63f0$0200a8c0@Desk> <rk0fsvcotkqp0ofgo7p1m3b79k3nndsket@4ax.com>

Maybe none would.   I just thought that was an unexpected example for a shot
from a lens without flare, since it shows a rather large amount of flare.

Bob

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 11:22 AM
Subject: [Leica] Re: Flare-resistant Leica wide angle lenses


> Robert:
>
> >That is to say, you like a lot of flare?
>
> Considering that picture is shot straight into the sunlight from a
semi-dark
> basement, I'm happy with the performance of the 35/2 asph.  That's not to
> say the lens (or my exposure) is perfect.  But I'd like to see the results
> from a lens that would show less flare in that situation.
>
>
> Eric
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com> ([Leica] Re: Flare-resistant Leica wide angle lenses)
In reply to: Message from Martin Krieger <krieger@usc.edu> ([Leica] Flare-resistant Leica wide angle lenses)
Message from "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com> ([Leica] Re: Flare-resistant Leica wide angle lenses)
Message from robertmeier@usjet.net (Re: [Leica] Re: Flare-resistant Leica wide angle lenses)
Message from "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com> ([Leica] Re: Flare-resistant Leica wide angle lenses)