Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Kit, Send it over so I can get a look at it. :-) Sam Krneta > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica- > users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Kit McChesney > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 6:35 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: RE: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The > LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced) > > Does this help? > > Software: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 can be connected to a PC/Mac via USB > connection and operated through the computer using Leica USB Remote > Control > Software. The user can control the exposure, resolution, compression, > preview window and histogram through the computer. An interval switch can > also be used. The images are saved directly to the computer. > > Scope of delivery: The camera is delivered with a 64 MB SD Memory Card, a > mains connector/battery charger, a 1400 mAh battery, Adobe Photoshop > Elements 2 for Win/Mac, ACDsee 6 PowerPack (Win), ACDsee 1.68 (Mac), Apple > QuickTime 6 (Win), USB drive for Windows 98 SE and Leica USB Remote > Control > Software, SilverFast DC-SE with Virtual Light Table > > Kit > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Dean > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 4:59 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA > DIGILUX 2 is announced) > > Hello. > > I have never sent a post here, but have been lurking for a while. > > Quite a sensitive issue this digital business, it seems. Anyway, my > friend, > who is fluent in Japanese, posted this on another list a while back. I > thought I might quote him here, as some might find this interesting. > > "There was an interesting artile on this in a recent issue of Asahi > Camera. > I think I've mentioned it before. The general judgement was that Leica was > providing quite different image-processing software, and that if you liked > the result (examples shown) it was definitely worth the difference in > price. The pictures did look rather different." > > Didn't see the mag myself, and I understand that what is quoted above > pretty > much covers everything that was said about the difference (i.e. that's all > there is on this at this time). > > Hope this was in some way useful (more virtual wheat to be ground in the > speculation mill?). > > Sooner, > Dean Johnston > > > > > . > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html