Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] The fine line between art and pornography
From: Jim Hemenway <Jim@hemenway.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:57:24 -0500
References: <b02000301-1031-FC1D6BFF2C3111D8AB91000393D465D8@[10.0.1.3]>

I just looked at those pics again... are we sure that it's not Jergen's 
lotion?

:-)

Jim - http://www.hemenway.com





Adam Bridge wrote:

> On 2003-12-11 lwwesson@pier1.com (leo) thoughtfully wrote: 
> 
> 
>>Are you sure that you read the interview?
>>
> 
> 
> I admit that I SKIMMED the interview but either the work stands by itself or it
> doesn't. Which is why it becomes performance art and uninteresting to me. 
> 
> Besides it could have been of dead people or masks or freeze-dried people for
> all the connection that exists.
> 
> I'm definately NOT in the audience and worry about those who are.
> 
> AB


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Adam Bridge <abridge@mac.com> (Re: [Leica] The fine line between art and pornography)