Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]No way. Ansel was an SLR man all the way. He has specifically said he did not like using rangefinders because their compositional accuracy never met his needs. His last camera that he used regularly was a Leica R4. But he was rich enough that's he'd be guying a Hassleblad H2 with the $12,000 digital back. No, wait, Hassleblad would have given him one. On Dec 12, 2003, at 9:11 PM, Jeff S wrote: > "Would Ansel Adams Have Gone Digital?" > Peter Lewis On Tech, Fortune.com > > http://www.fortune.com/fortune/ontech/0,15704,560361,00.html > > Further discussion on Slashdot: > http://slashdot.org/articles/03/12/12/1651200.shtml? > tid=126&tid=152&tid=185 > > Why Lewis sought the opinion of a Nikon exec seemed > strange, and said exec seemed to be grasping at straws > when pressed to name a digital camera that Adams might > have liked: A D100? Personally, I think a Digilux 2 > would've been closer to the mark ;-) > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now > http://companion.yahoo.com/ > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > Eric Welch Carlsbad, CA http://www.jphotog.com There are 2 theories to arguing with a woman... neither works. - Will Rogers. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html