Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: Lunasix 3 issue
From: "Steven Blutter" <steven2244@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:12:08 -0600
References: <AA8181AA-2F47-11D8-A313-000A9578C446@ncable.net.au> <002501c3c364$995bebf0$0100a8c0@Desktop> <Pine.SOL.4.58-L.0312161400330.16245@hedvig.uio.no>

Thanks - good advise

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Daniel Ridings" <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 7:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: Lunasix 3 issue


> > Right now I'm fiddling with it and on the low range the needle goes up
> > beyond 12 in this particular illumination.  But, taking the exact same
> > reading in the high range, the needle drops below 12.  Thus no
consensus.
> > No accurate reading is possible.
>
> That used to happen with my LunaPro 3 (I say used to, because I went over
> to a Digisix and a Digiflash a few months ago). I usually just settled on
> setting it at 12.
>
> I know the lighting you're talking about EI 400, 1/60th @ f2.8 ... it's
> ALWAYS like that. I quit using a meter for that light. It's boring always
> getting the same reading.
>
> So if that'st the range giving you problems, take the Gossen. It's
> trustworthy away from that borderline and now you know what the borderline
> is, so you can just go with 1/60th @ 2.8.
>
> Daniel
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Alastair Firkin <firkin@ncable.net.au> (Re: [Leica] FOM 2)
Message from "Steven Blutter" <steven2244@ameritech.net> ([Leica] OT: Lunasix 3 issue)
Message from Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no> (Re: [Leica] OT: Lunasix 3 issue)