Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Why is the IIIg so much more expensive?
From: John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 10:53:44 -0700
References: <a02010001-1032-6716810C324711D89622003065F48752@[10.0.1.8]>
 
Far fewer produced (40k as opposed to 130k+) and a much more useable 
camera. The IIIg has a normal shutter speed progression, easy to use 
flash sync, easy to use finder with parallax compensating framelines 
for the common 50 and 90 lenses. Prices for a battered user is not too 
bad if you can find one.

John Collier

On Dec 19, 2003, at 10:18 AM, Adam Bridge wrote:

> I've noticed that prices for a IIIg on "that site" are 3 times or more 
> the price of a IIIf. Why is this?

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to: Message from Adam Bridge <abridge@mac.com> ([Leica] Why is the IIIg so much more expensive?)