Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/12/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R
From: JCB <jcb@visualimpressions.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 09:48:13 -0800
References: <002901c3cce1$d80e9c90$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8> <20031227201539.78162.qmail@web40909.mail.yahoo.com> <000f01c3ccc9$777428e0$87d86c18@gv.shawcable.net> <002901c3cce1$d80e9c90$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8>
I bought these books when they first were published. What a waste of money!
JB
At 02:54 AM 12/28/2003 -0600, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
>animal [s.jessurun95@chello.nl] quoth:
>*>>
>*>I found a nice explanation of the topic in the in and out of focus book by
>*>Merklinger which is available for download as a pdf file.
>*>
>*>p.s.
>*>Sorry for not including a link to the book but my mouse failed and am
>*>relearning keystroke navigation
>
>http://www.trenholm.org/hmmerk/#TIAOOF
>
>e.
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] Re: DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Reply from JCB <jcb@visualimpressions.com> ([Leica] Re: Re: DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
In reply to:
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from Lee <leeh0@yahoo.com> (Re: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)