Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 2/20/04 2:18 AM, "Dan C" <leicaman@sympatico.ca> wrote: > I thought the Panasonic was well received, perhaps even more so than the > digilux 1. > > -dan c. > > > > At 11:45 PM 19-02-04 -0800, Mark Rabiner wrote: >> In the case of the Digilux I (as if it has that much to do with the Digilux >> II) the software in the Panasonic did not cut the mustard. There lies the >> rub. A mustard rub. Which could go either way. >> The Leica was Liked. The Panasonic was panned. >> And might have strangely cost more money than the Leica. > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html Absolutely! you'll make them think I said otherwise, Dan! Mark Rabiner Photography Portland, Oregon http://rabinergroup.com/ - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html