Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: RD-1 lens suitability
From: "Sonny Carter" <SonC@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:43:36 -0600
References: <ac.52bc1a40.2d8288ea@aol.com> <40514D29.90902@aol.com> <40513661.1045670A@pacbell.net>

The list yesterday was "as of March 11"  Perhaps they tried it and found 
it collapsed too deeply on a working prototype.  Anyhow the first 
presentation was PR hype, and it is my guess they were trying to link 
the historical Leica with this.  They seem to have succeeded, er?

SonC

Jerry Lehrer wrote on 3/11/2004, 10:02 PM:

 > Sonny
 >
 > Strange,  'cause the f2.5 50mm Hektor was shown on that camera
 > when we first saw pics of it.  That is collapsible also.
 >
 > Jerry
 >
 > Sonny Carter wrote:
 >
 > > Because of the extension of those lenses behind the mount. ??
 > >
 > > LRZeitlin@aol.com wrote on 3/11/04, 7:30 PM:
 > >
 > >  >
 > >  > In the preliminary review of the RD-1
 > >  >
 > >  > << http://www.dpreview.com/news/0403/04031101epsonrd1.asp >>
 > >  >
 > >  > there is a statement that the camera cannot be used with the 50 mm
 > >  > Elmar 3.5
 > >  > or the 50 mm f2.0 DR Summicron (along with a few other lenses).
 > >  >
 > >  > Why not?
 > >  >
 > >  > Larry Z
 > >  > --
 > >  > To unsubscribe, see
 > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
 > >  >
 > >
 > > --
 > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
 >
 > --
 > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
 >


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from LRZeitlin@aol.com ([Leica] Re: RD-1 lens suitability)
Message from "Sonny Carter" <SonC@aol.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: RD-1 lens suitability)
Message from Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: RD-1 lens suitability)