Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] PAW
From: bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Sun Mar 28 05:55:09 2004

11-22 at 11 - 2x factor. Shot at f 2.8 - 800 iso. But I have to say that
I agree with whoever it was - I think Rolf - who said that until there
is a single-sensor size, or at least one that is widely adopted, the 35
mm equiv makes the most sense. 

B. D.

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Frank Dernie
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 4:08 AM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] PAW


I agree completely, having the equivalent is interesting but knowing 
the exact focal length would be better IMO as well. I guess the 
companies want people to still buy on pixel count despite the fact that 
this is no longer the major limitation.
Frank


On 27 Mar 2004, at 20:02, George Lottermoser wrote:

> From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>>> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 13:20:02 -0500
>>> To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org>
>>> Subject: [Leica] PAW
>>>
>>> http://www.leica-gallery.net/bdcolen/image-63132.html
>>>
>>> Alt 1 http://www.leica-gallery.net/bdcolen/image-63133.html
>>> Alt 2 http://www.leica-gallery.net/bdcolen/image-63134.html
>>>
>>> All shot with Leica E1 and 21.... ;-)
>
> Something weird about refering to the lenses on these digicams in
> terms of 35mm equiv. I'd appreciate knowing actual lens specs rather 
> than equivs because then I can actually gain knowledge about chip 
> size, depth, etc. For nearly 50 years I've been able to discuss actual

> focal length regardless of format - can't we keep speaking in real 
> focal length? Anyone else feel similar?
>
> Fond regards,
>
> G e o r g e   L o t t e r m o s e r,    imagistT
>
> <.>Peace<.>   <.>Harmony<.>  <.>Stewardship<.>
>
> Presenting effective messages in beautiful ways
>                                      since 1975 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> web	                          <www.imagist.com>
> eMail                        george@imagist.com
> voice                              262 241 9375
> fax                                262 241 9398
>                       Lotter Moser & Associates
> 10050 N Port Washington Rd  -  Mequon, WI 53092 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from george at imagist.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] PAW)
In reply to: Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] PAW)