Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M 135 Opinions/Comments/Anecdotes/Cautions
From: shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka)
Date: Mon Mar 29 16:23:06 2004
References: <000901c415d1$b24e2370$1062cf0a@BH01> <007501c415d2$cacb67e0$6401a8c0@CCA4A5EF37E11E>
 
wow, do we agree on something?

:-)

-rei

On Mar29 16:14, B. D. Colen wrote:
> Oh blah, blah blah, Buzz -;-) An APO it ain't, but it also ain't no
> pooch. Heavy, yes, but it makes using a 135 on an M practical with those
> eyes. And soft? Compared to an APO? Yup. But it's more than good enough
> for gummint work. In fact, I'd say it's one of the real bargins in Leica
> lensdom, given that it can be picked up for under $500.
> 
> B. D.
> A contrarian to the end. :-)

-- 
Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com
Ridgewood, New Jersey
Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] M 135 Opinions/Comments/Anecdotes/Cautions)
Reply from jerryleh at pacbell.net (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] M 135 Opinions/Comments/Anecdotes/Cautions)
 In reply to: Message from buzz at bethhardiman.com (Buzz Hausner) ([Leica] M 135 Opinions/Comments/Anecdotes/Cautions)
Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] M 135 Opinions/Comments/Anecdotes/Cautions)