Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/04/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Try a few old-fashioned developers with it, like Rodinal. Or Ethol TEC, You might find some good results. Jeffery Smith New Orleans, LA -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Eric Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2004 9:12 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: [Leica] Re: Fuji Neopan Acros 100 vs. Fuji Neopan SS 100 Jeffery: >The Acros costs twice as much. There's gotta be some difference. The Acros is 3.69 vs. 1.99 for the SS. But, the US Neopan 400 is 3.99 compared to 2.49 for the import that's the same stuff. So the price difference didn't seem to be a big deal to me. I tried a few rolls of the import 400, and as far as I can tell, it's the same quality. So I felt safe getting the import 100. Oh, well. It was cheap. $40 for 20 rolls. I don't use much 100, anyway. If it's that bad, I can probably give it away to somebody. :) Thanks for the added info, Tom & Nathan! -- Eric http://canid.com/ _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information