Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Ten years behind? I think not.
From: feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio)
Date: Wed May 5 10:23:34 2004
References: <000101c432c4$7e51ded0$6401a8c0@CCA4A5EF37E11E>
 
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 10:14, B. D. Colen wrote:
> BUT...And I am NOT looking for a fight with the R crowd...by modern SLR
> standards, those same R8s with what you say is great metering and that
> great Leica glass, are definitely at least a decade behind the curve in
> terms of features. R8 aficionados may not want those features, but they
> are a given in the rest of the photo world, and that - and pricing -
> severely limits the R market.
> 
> BTW - to what Nikon are you comparing the R8's metering?
> 
> B. D.

What metering features is the R8 lacking and does it really matter?


Feli
Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Ten years behind? I think not.)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Ten years behind? I think not.)
 In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Ten years behind? I think not.)