Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Re: Ten years behind? I think not
From: fmaturana at euskalnet.net (Felix Lopez de Maturana)
Date: Fri May 7 07:40:46 2004
References: <200405070027.i470OVjV097604@server1.waverley.reid.org>

>The biggest drawback is you have to shoot with that fuzzy Nikon glass.
>;-)
>
>
>Feli

Is this a joke? If not -no more idiomatic problems- have you ever used a
good Nikkor lens? If not how do you know it's a drawback? Besides using
Leica lenses I've used for last 35 years exactly 28 Nikkor lenses in 24x36
and 4 in MF and, excepting some dogs the -43-86 zoom mainly- most of them
are excellent and some outstanding. The most complete photographic system
ever built and one of the best. The Nikon F -I have two working since1968
with no CLA- was in fact the PJ Leica camera killer. This brand deserves a
respect however I, right now, do prefer Canon.Leica may be the best but
others do exist succesfully and will do in future. May we say the same of
Leica?

Felix

PS Who still uses his Nikon F5 and do not need look back as never left
anything back.



Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Re: Re: Ten years behind? I think not)
Reply from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] Re: Re: Ten years behind? I think not)