Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Re: Ten years behind? I think not
From: daniel.ridings at muspro.uio.no (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Mon May 10 05:15:31 2004
References: <004101c4345a$bed4e1e0$6401a8c0@CCA4A5EF37E11E>
 
> See the smiley Felix? It's a joke. There is a lot of good Nikon glass. I
> think on average the Leica glass is better, but it also costs a hell of
> a lot more. I have always been a fan of Nikon bodies and I have actually
> been thinking about getting a F2 or F3 because I need a good, fast
> lightweight 180. Any suggestions?

The 180/2.8 is a winner. Go for an F3 rather than an F2. You pay
collector's prices for F2 and the F3 is soooo much more camera.

Daniel
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Re: Re: Ten years behind? I think not)