Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/06/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] which R to avoid
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Fri Jun 18 14:35:02 2004

The numbers I've told to stay away from are anything below 1,632,551. That
would make it above 1983 vintage.
S. Dimitrov

> From: "Bill Grimwood" <bill@grimwood.net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:56:42 -0500
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: Re: [Leica] which R to avoid
> 
> I used to own an R4 with the first two digits of 15 so some were made with
> numbers below 1,600,000
> 
> Bill Grimwood
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Douglas Herr" <telyt@earthlink.net>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 3:19 PM
> Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: [Leica] which R to avoid
> 
> 
>> Thinkofcole@aol.com wrote:
>> 
>>> While I stick to range finder, my notes say to avoid the R4 and the R4S
>>> below Serial No. 1,600,000.
>> 
>> All R4s bodies have a serial number above 1,600,000.
>> 
>> 
>> Doug Herr
>> Birdman of Sacramento
>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from bill at grimwood.net (Bill Grimwood) ([Leica] which R to avoid)