Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/06/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Good Lord, Simon - do we now require scientific prove for statements made on the LUG? I hope no one's told Brian, because if he becomes aware of this new standard he's going to have to shut this bullshit factory down so quickly we won't even be able to see it happening. ;-) But all kidding aside - First, let me say that I am speaking about writing in America. And second, I believe that my statement reflects the near universal opinion of those who observe such things. (And no, I am not footnoting this statement.) B. D. -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of animal Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:11 AM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] RE: While it is happening (B. D. Colen)writing goingdwnhll > > Now, as to the proliferation of writing tools improving writing...I > think just the opposite may be true. While Email is probably causing > more people to communicate in writing, the quality of writing today > has markedly deteriorated over that of a few decades ago, and appears > to be going nowhere but downhill. > How can you prove such a statement? simon _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information