Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/07/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Which twin is the problem child?
From: jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Thu Jul 1 06:36:49 2004
References: <1e5.242a1004.2e15675c@aol.com> <6.0.1.1.2.20040701082202.01cfde10@pop.runbox.com> <004901c45f71$0fb48b10$6401a8c0@lan.artvader.com>
That's two Lavorises. Maybe it isn't so odd.
At 08:41 AM 7/1/2004, you wrote:
>In the 60's when my sister first entered Pediatric nursing, she came home
>one day and mentioned that a woman named her new born twins... Lavoris &
>Clitoris.....!!!
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies:
Reply from woc2 at earthlink.net (Bill O'Connell) ([Leica] Which twin is the problem child?)
In reply to:
Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] Which twin is the problem child?)
Message from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Which twin is the problem child?)
Message from jon.stanton at comcast.net (Jon) ([Leica] Which twin is the problem child?)