Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/08/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Born At Risk...
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard F. Man)
Date: Sun Aug 1 21:09:17 2004
References: <6.1.0.6.2.20040731230301.0513b440@192.168.100.11> <004d01c477c7$e9db7f10$6601a8c0@ccapr.com>

Heh, I was just being tongue in cheek. You know I have the greatest respect 
for your photos. In fact, now that I have done some "travel photos," I have 
a lot of respect on Karen's Ethnophotography and Tina's stuff. It is so 
darn tough to shoot what you guys do!!! When I look at my photos, I almost 
feel like chunking the whole setup out the windows and take up something 
else....

At 06:03 AM 8/1/2004, B. D. Colen wrote:

>Thanks, Richard - I think. But how about a reality check here...Tri-X
>shot at 800 "look(s) like crap as large prints" unless viewed from an
>appropriate viewing distance - just as digital looks like crap unless
>viewed at proper viewing distance. I have seen images shot with a 5 mgp
>sensor blown up to 30x40, and if viewed standing back - as they are
>designed to be viewed - they are magnificent. Step right up to them and,
>just as prints from film would look like buckets of golf balls, so to
>the prints from digital....

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please 
use richard@imagecraft.com) 

Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Born At Risk...)
In reply to: Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard F. Man) ([Leica] Born At Risk...)
Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Born At Risk...)