Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/08/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yeah, that's provides only dual cold accessory function, me'thinks primarily for finder + bubble level duty using the wides. Scott buzz.hausner@verizon.net wrote: >Try this link. http://cameraquest.com/voigtacc.htm#Double Accessory Shoe . > They're forty-five bucks, but they do not provide hot-shoe capability. > >Buzz Hausner > > > >>From: Scott McLoughlin <scott@adrenaline.com> >>Date: 2004/08/26 Thu AM 11:21:28 EDT >>To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> >>Subject: [Leica] Flash / PC Cord Question >> >>Kind folk, >> >>I want to use my new little Oly S20 flash with my M6 >>when I have an accessory finder in the hot shoe. >> >>So, I'm looking for a camera PC socket cord with a >>female (?) flash shoe connector on the other end. >> >>In some situations, a bracket might be preferable to holding >>the flash, so any suggestions on a small bracket for the M6 >>that could hold the flash would be helpful as well. >> >>I did a brief search on B&H and Adorama and was pretty >>overwhelmed by all the options. >> >>Any idea what I need? >> >>Thanks >> >>Scott >> >>B. D. Colen wrote: >> >> >> >>>BUT...Most professional 120 use is based on the quality requirements of >>>magazines. And the question then is not whether the 120 backs will >>>become affordable; rather, it is whether 35 full-frame digital cameras, >>>such as the EOS1Ds and the Kodak, can provide image quality on a par >>>with 120 film. If they can, then the cost of 120 backs becomes >>>irrelevant and 120 becomes irrelevant. There is also the question of >>>whether smaller sensors in DSLRs, used at 50 iso, will produce such >>>clean images that they, too, can eliminate the need for 120. I wouldn't >>>be investing in Hasselblad OR Imacon right now. >>> >>>B. D. >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org >>>[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of >>>Mark Rabiner >>>Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 2:41 PM >>>To: Leica Users Group >>>Subject: Re: [Leica] Ilford chapter 11? >>> >>> >>>On 8/25/04 10:07 AM, "FRANK DERNIE" <frank.dernie@btinternet.com> typed: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>I wonder whether 120 or 35mm film will be the more >>>>popular in the future. I would expect 35mm to be less interesting >>>>because it is so easily comparable in size weight and quality to >>>>digital. It would not surprise me if mf film continues to have a >>>>stronger following than 35mm in the long term. >>>>I almost never use 35mm now that digital is so good. I >>>>still use MF if I want high quality and scan the >>>>negatives. >>>>Frank >>>>--- Dan Post <dpost@triad.rr.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>I think we need to wait just a little longer for the shoe to drop on the >>>medium format digital thing. They are either going to break that 20 thou >>>price point and get into the 2-5 thou price point of a the non Rolls >>>Royce crowd or shrivel. I predict, having confidence in technology which >>>usually is rewarded, that they'll figure the affordable medium format >>>digital thing out. Existing medium format cameras wont be thrown into >>>the bins with the Instamatics. >>> >>>The Blads and the Brownies.... >>> >>> >>>Mark Rabiner >>>Photography >>>Portland Oregon >>>http://rabinergroup.com/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Leica Users Group. >>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Leica Users Group. >>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >>> >>> >>> >>_______________________________________________ >>Leica Users Group. >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >