Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Updated version of Modern Dance for this week
From: Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway)
Date: Sat Sep 4 06:33:15 2004
References: <005201c40ae2$d60d50a0$72054d51@desktop> <006701c409dd$313006f0$0300a8c0@dad> <BCEKKGNGDPMOIPMEJONBMEBJEBAA.phong@doan-ltd.com> <00f101c40984$30ce3550$f131d742@clearsighjhm83> <BAY10-DAV10X9wcUags00033158@hotmail.com> <dak850dk5dpp57tt7getkrlspf4rurvskp@4ax.com> <840B44B7-75C9-11D8-9707-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca> <006701c409dd$313006f0$0300a8c0@dad> <5.1.0.14.0.20040315154206.00b0b1c0@mail-aj.acpub.duke.edu> <5.1.0.14.0.20040316144437.0298b908@mail-aj.acpub.duke.edu>

Aaron:

I like the old one better as it is more mysterious and leaves more to 
the imagination.

Jim - http://www.hemenway.com

P.S. Don't hold your breath waiting for more shadow detail from most 
scanners.


Aaron Sandler wrote:

> After receiving much advice and encouragement from folks here, as well 
> as a little nudge by Graham, I went back to the original scan of this 
> week's PAW and found a little bit of shadow detail in the second 
> dancer's head.
> 
> The new version is at: http://www.duke.edu/~ajs2/PAW/2004_11/index.html
> 
> And a comparison between the old and new is at: 
> http://www.duke.edu/~ajs2/PAW/2004_11/compare.html (new on the left; old 
> on the right).
> 
> I definitely like the new one better, and I definitely have a lot more 
> to learn about this part of the process.  I'll try to get more out of 
> the image once I get my scanner...seems like a good neg to practice on.
> 
> Thanks to all who made suggestions,
> Aaron
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 



--
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


Replies: Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Updated version of Modern Dance for this week)