Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Lab vs. home processing
From: sam at osheaven.net (Sam)
Date: Sat Sep 4 06:33:32 2004
References: <2867578BB7767E45B3C9E3CBA9C5A65F13F1A8@smskpexmbx3.mskcc.root.mskcc.org> <4062016C.8050608@osheaven.net> <1080165813.23270.77.camel@creo_pc3>

I read this a while ago:

http://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/Harvey/harvey.html

As a youngster I remember it being mentioned and advertised in 
magazines, but I never used it.

Sam S



Feli di Giorgio wrote:

>Speaking of developers...has anyone here ever seen or heard of 777?
>Seems to be a mysterious brew that was used at several news places,
>among them Magnum in N.Y.
>
>http://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/Harvey/harvey.html
>
>Looks interesting.
>
>Does anyone here use a developer that is not discarded after one use,
>but replenished or this something that is only viable if you are
>processing large amounts of film. Is there an advantage to a 'ripened'
>solution?
>
>
>feli
>
>
>On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 13:45, Sam wrote:
>  
>
>>I've not encountered the problem. I most often use Tri-X in D-23.
>>
>>Sam S
>>
>>
>>Saganich, Christopher/Medical Physics wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Some films are very sensitive to agitation with D23, in fact my 
>>>experience was difficult. I kept reducing agitation to get the CI down.  
>>>Once you get it where you want it, it dandy.  
>>>
>>>Chris Saganich
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: lug-bounces+saganicc=mskcc.org@leica-users.org 
>>>[mailto:lug-bounces+saganicc=mskcc.org@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Sam
>>>Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 3:15 PM
>>>To: Leica Users Group
>>>Subject: Re: [Leica] Lab vs. home processing.
>>>
>>>The formula below is for use as a single solution developer. I only 
>>>resort to 2 bath development when I'm dealing with seriously high 
>>>contrast along with shadow detail that must be recorded. Single bath 
>>>D-23 is best used undiluted. All but extreme highlights will hold.
>>>
>>>Sam S
>>>
>>>
>>>Feli di Giorgio wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 12:02, Sam wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>Yes. It acts very much like D-76. In fact, my times for D-23 are the 
>>>>>published times for D-76. It's a famous older developer that is 
>>>>>renowned 
>>>>>for its ability to hold highlights.
>>>>>
>>>>>If you would like to try it, this is the original formula:
>>>>>
>>>>>Water (125 degrees, 50 Cel.) 24 oz. /  750 cc.
>>>>>Metol 1/4 oz. / 7.5 grams
>>>>>Sodium Sulfite 3 oz. / 100 grams
>>>>>Cold water to make 32 ozs. / 1 liter
>>>>>Dissolve chemicals in order given above (If you add the Sodium Sulfite 
>>>>>first it will difficult if not impossible to get a solution)
>>>>>Use D-76 developing times to start.
>>>>>
>>>>>Sam S
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>Thanks. I read a big article about D23 over at the unblinkingeye.com
>>>>Looks like you are using a A and B solution.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>feli
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Leica Users Group.
>>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Leica Users Group.
>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    =====================================================================
>>>    
>>>    Please note that this e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be 
>>>    privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure under 
>>>    applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
>>>    recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
>>>    message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
>>>    reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this 
>>>    communication or any of its attachments is strictly prohibited.  If 
>>>    you have received this communication in error, please notify the 
>>>    sender immediately by replying to this message and deleting this 
>>>    message, any attachments, and all copies and backups from your 
>>>    computer.
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Leica Users Group.
>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>    
>>


In reply to: Message from saganicc at MSKCC.ORG (Saganich, Christopher/Medical Physics) ([Leica] Lab vs. home processing.)
Message from sam at osheaven.net (Sam) ([Leica] Lab vs. home processing.)
Message from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] Lab vs. home processing)