Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: new 1ds mark II
From: ericm at pobox.com (Eric)
Date: Fri Sep 24 16:26:03 2004
References: <41547D92.30309@planet.nl> <00b401c4a275$46f15170$6401a8c0@ccapr.com>

B.D.:

>I realize that there are development costs, etc. But I wonder...What do
>you suppose would happen if Leica offered that back at cost? That's
>right - at cost? Let's suppose that the back COSTS $1500 to produce.
>Suppose they sold it for $1500, which would allow any Leica R owner to
>get into high quality digital for $1500. And would allow anyone else to
>get into high quality digital AND Leica for the $1500 plus the cost of a
>used R8...How many R bodies would Leica then sell? How many R lenses?
>I'm no business man, but I'll bet they would make allot more money in
>the long run selling that thing at cost, bringing new Leicaphiles into
>the Leicatent  than they'll ever make selling it at 4K plus...

If a company sells a product at cost, it's losing money.  You can't break
eve by selling at cost.  There are costs for transporting and storing
product.  There are warranty costs with fixing bad units.  There are
personnel costs in selling the product.  Leica isn't a large company.  If
they start losing money on every sale (but make up for it in volume! :),
they're going to be in trouble.

Ok...so let's give them some padding to account for their costs of selling
the product, but don't give them any profit.  Next, the dealers need to make
a profit.  Pretty soon, even without amortizing R&D costs and still without
making a profit on the initial investment, the price of each back is going
to be over $3k...assuming it costs $1500 to make.

Perhaps the digital back could be bundled into a package so that Leica and
the dealers make an overall profit, but the package could be cheaper than
buying the pieces individually.  That's still not going to be price
competitive with Canon's offerings.

While I'd love to be able to pay $1500 for a back to make my M digital, I
don't see it happening anytime soon.  And based on the problems the initial
M6TTL models had with batteries draining, I'm not going to be the first to
get in line to buy a high-tech product from Leica.  Their glass is wonderful
beyond question.  They have not proven themselves to be capable high-tech
engineers.  I'm hoping that changes.  I'll get out of line and let others go
first, though.  :)

--
Eric
http://canid.com/


Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Re: new 1ds mark II)
In reply to: Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] new 1ds mark II)
Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] new 1ds mark II)