Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Photogs in a Digitally Abreviated World
From: sethrosner at direcway.com (Seth Rosner)
Date: Mon Dec 13 08:20:31 2004
References: <6.1.0.6.2.20041212001714.05994150@192.168.100.42> <4cfa589b0412121046642c5df8@mail.gmail.com> <6638011.1102905541273.JavaMail.s_gregory1@mac.com> <013b01c4e0c5$30704620$0201a8c0@jayanand> <41BD41E5.2D61B875@earthlink.net>
 
Steve Gandy wrote:

> the only way I know of to really safeguard that valued digital print is to
> make a silver neg copy of the digital print.  in silver I trust the 
> future,
> not digital.  someday maybe, but not now.  I am open to other solutions,
> but I won't believe unproved claims of  estimated life spans of digital
> prints and digital storage mediums.>

Yes, yes and yes.

Seth          LaK 9
Replies: Reply from ruben at rhodos.dk (Ruben) ([Leica] development)
Reply from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] Photogs in a Digitally Abreviated World)
 In reply to: Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] The only Leica I ever sold -- survey time)
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Printer experiences of the LUG)
Message from s_gregory1 at mac.com (Scott Gregory) ([Leica] Printer experiences of the LUG)
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Printer experiences of the LUG)
Message from leicanikon at earthlink.net (Stephen Gandy) ([Leica] Photogs in a Digitally Abreviated World)