Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hello Michiel, It is possible that the batch is defective or compatibility problem with the lab. Will try rating it at asa 250 and see how it goes. Regards, Nelson ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michiel Fokkema" <michiel.fokkema@wanadoo.nl> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 1:59 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Fuji NPH 400 trouble > nelson chan wrote: >> Hello Fellow Lugger, >> >> Happy New Year!! >> >> The NPH is giving me headache, almost all my prints came out underexposed >> (I think). color is lifeless and prints are generally grainy. Tried >> shooting at asa 320 but still prints came out lousy. I don't know if it >> is the lab or the film I bought is defective. Should I set it at asa 250? >> I have excellent results with Fuji NPS 160 and Kodak 160 Portra 160. >> Thanks in advance. >> >> Regards, Nelson >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > Hi Nelson, > > I use nph in both 35mm and MF. I always expose at 400 and never have a > problem. The printing however is very important. It can make or break your > pictures. Might have been a batch out of spec. > > Michiel Fokkema > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information