Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I guess the perception is that WalMart has lost their sense of humor. I doubt that anyone would surmise that WalMart encourages or condones indecent exposure. It wouldn't bother me too much, as I don't really like WalMart all that much so banning me from WalMart wouldn't have much of an impact. On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 12:19:51 -0600, Eric <ericm@pobox.com> wrote: > Steve: > > >any lawyers out there? > > Why? I don't see how Wal-mart is in the wrong. > > A guy takes a photograph on somebody else's property. The owners of the > property says they don't like photographs being taken without prior > permission, and that if the photographer doesn't want to hand over the > photo, he isn't welcome back. If he comes back, he would be legally > trespassing. > > Am I missing something? > > I'm all for photographers' rights, but I'm also for property owners' > rights, > too. I wouldn't want to be forced to allow other people to do whatever > they > want on my property. > > -- > Eric > http://canid.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >