Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Film
From: s.jessurun95 at chello.nl (animal)
Date: Thu Jan 20 17:30:51 2005
References: <20050120004733.77507.qmail@web51102.mail.yahoo.com> <4D42378C-6AB6-11D9-90AC-000D933F4332@earthlink.net>


> Just shot my friends wedding, as the official shooter. Several other 
> guests shot digital D60, D10, Nikon D100. (it's the movie biz so everyone 
> is a photographer...)
>
> I shot Fuji 160NPS and Kodak 400 Porta NC, which I have been scanning on 
> my Nikon SCS 5000ED.
>
> I had totally forgotten just how good, professional color print stock 
> looks. I hate to say it, but the neg scans look so much more lush than the 
> digital stuff. The white gowns in particular (it was a bright sunny day 
> here in Los Angeles). The film shots just have so much more dynamic range, 
> it's not even funny. The Nikon scanner is putting out 3670x5625 scans, 
> which are blazing sharp (current 2/50 Cron R and M). The big advantage 
> that the digital shots have is the auto white balance and the Nikon D100 
> was better at it than the Canons.  The Canon did really badly with 
> tungsten lighting, very warm. The digital advantage really becomes obvious 
> in mixed light...
>
> Secondly, thank Solms for the M7 and AE. Absolutely amazing. It's hard to 
> believe that the whole metering system consists of a blotch of white paint 
> and a meter cell.
>
> Feli
Hi it,s probably due to the Caol ila i consumed that i missed a link to your 
latest succes.
Would you help me find the pics?
Thanks
simon jessurun
amsterdam 


Replies: Reply from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] Film)
In reply to: Message from bill_clough at yahoo.com (Bill Clough) ([Leica] Obituary)
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] Film)