Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Which was the "poor quality" Leica - M4-2 or M4-P?
From: vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko)
Date: Sat Jan 22 10:33:22 2005
 
Can you tell me which was considered the "poor quality" Leica, the M4-2
or M4-P?

Which was first?

What was the significance of the "P"?  

And any truth to the entire statement of "poorer quality" Leica, from a
working and repair-bills point of view?

Regards,

Vick Ko
Replies: Reply from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] Which was the "poor quality" Leica - M4-2 or M4-P?)
Reply from mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist) ([Leica] Which was the "poor quality" Leica - M4-2 or M4-P?)