Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I didn't want to imply that it was. I remarked on its viewfinder being so nice, then I realized that if I looked through a newer Leica, it would probably be nice too. All of mine are old. I'm actually looking for a replacement for the CL, not for an M. I just want to use that 40mm Summicron. (Looks like the Bessa R3a is for me). Outlive me? It just might, even if the build isn't up to Leica quality. I'm no spring chicken anymore :-) Daniel On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, B. D. Colen wrote: > There is no question the Bessa R2 is NOT an M: It is not built like an M > and will not outlive you; it's shutter is not as quiet as an M shutter;