Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/02/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] 75 'cron
From: rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig)
Date: Sat Feb 5 13:09:35 2005
References: <6.2.1.2.2.20050205183712.03da4eb0@mail.screengang.com> <BE2A52CD.1E748%telyt@earthlink.net> <6.2.1.2.2.20050205195317.039e4060@mail.screengang.com> <a43c47e6554a05884f70dc638a2cc296@btinternet.com>
DMR:
+
Resolution (10 mio px. vs. 8.2 mio)
20D:
+
higher ISO rating (100-3200 ASA vs. 100-1600)
more metering patterns
MF plus 9-point AF (vs. MF only)
startup delay
continuous shooting
weight (770g incl. body+batt. vs. 1395g incl. body+dmr+batt)
There are at least enough reasons to compare them. IMO the 20D wins clearly
at points (and I'm not talking about price and availability)
Didier
>Absolutely no reason why this should be so.
>
>>EOS20D or a D70 can easily outperform the DMR
Replies:
Reply from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Re: R8/20D comparison (WAS: 75 'cron))
In reply to:
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] 75 'cron)
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] 75 'cron)
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] 75 'cron)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] 75 'cron)