Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I must recant my statement below. The dog is not ugly, it is only the photography that makes it seem so. SonC In a message dated 2/10/2005 8:08:21 A.M. Central Standard Time, SonC@aol.com writes: In a message dated 2/10/2005 5:30:06 A.M. Central Standard Time, richard-lists@imagecraft.com writes: Non Leica, and I didn't take them, but who cares :-) Well, I care. Sorry, but the few shots I sampled are not worth looking at. This list is already cluttered, but for the life of me I cannot fathom why you posted this set of bad pictures of an ugly dog. I know it is uncharacteristic of me to be so blunt these days, but geez. If you want to post crap, get yourself a blog. Regards, Sonny http://www.sonc.com Natchitoches, Louisiana Oldest continuous settlement in La Louisiane ?galit?, libert?, crawfish