Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Which 35mm 'cron or 'lux now pdf files
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Sat Feb 12 12:32:00 2005
References: <000001c510fa$d11ec410$6501a8c0@dorysrusp4>

>Leica has MTF curves available on the 35 LUX and the 28 Summicron.  The
>28 and 35 can be found here:
>
>http://www.leica-camera.com/produkte/msystem/objektive/weitwinkel/index_
>e.html
>
>The PDF's clearly show that the 28 is superior in the outer regions.  Of
>course, at F1.4, there is only one applicant.
>
>I believe that both lenses are very resistant to flare.
>
>However, rather than worry about line pairs, ask yourself if you are
>comfortable shooting very close to people or prefer vast spatial
>separation.  If so then the move to 28 is called for.  On the other side
>of the debate is the preference for a multi-purpose lens: one that can
>both be normal and wide angle.  For this application the 35 is the
>better choice.
>
>Don
>dorysrus@mindspring.com
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org
>[mailto:lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf
>Of William G. Lamb, III
>Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 9:36 PM
>To: Leica Users Group
>Subject: Re: [Leica] Which 35mm 'cron or 'lux?
>
>
>Henning,
>
>Not that I take everything that Irwin writes as gospel, but I'll happily
>
>mail you his M-Lenses pdf if you like. There is little doubt in his mind
>
>nor mine.

Yes, the evidence is there. I will eat crow on that point.

-- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com

In reply to: Message from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Which 35mm 'cron or 'lux now pdf files)