Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/03/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 75mm F/2 M lens?
From: bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C)
Date: Mon Mar 21 15:08:24 2005
References: <BE653E48.49434%joseph@yao.com>

If only Joseph collected Leica M6 .85 pre-TTLs!

-dan c.

At 04:40 PM 21-03-05 -0500, Buzz Hausner wrote:
>It is a good thing Joseph, that you do not collect fine and rare books
>or autographed letters and manuscripts.  Now, about that previously
>owned Bugatti Royalle...
>
>       Buzz Hausner
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: lug-bounces+buzz.hausner=verizon.net@leica-users.org
>[mailto:lug-bounces+buzz.hausner=verizon.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf
>Of Joseph Yao
>Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 2:15 PM
>To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>Subject: Re: [Leica] 75mm F/2 M lens?
>
>
>Secondly and more importantly, I would never buy used
>if the same is available new.  The same applies not only to photo
>equipment,
>but also to cars, fine watches and just about everything.  I find it
>very
>hard to accept something that has been used, fondled and possessed by
>someone else.  The only exception is when the item in question is no
>longer
>available new.  In such case I would only consider 'new-old-stock',
>followed
>by LNIB, MIB and as a severe compromise, 'mint-'.
>
>Perhaps I need to see a shrink, but then I did not marry a divorcee
>either.
>
>Joseph - overworked ER doc with OCD regarding new Leica toys  ;-)
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from buzz.hausner at verizon.net (Buzz Hausner) ([Leica] 75mm F/2 M lens?)
Reply from phong at doan-ltd.com (Phong) ([Leica] 75mm F/2 M lens?)
In reply to: Message from joseph at yao.com (Joseph Yao) ([Leica] 75mm F/2 M lens?)
Message from buzz.hausner at verizon.net (Buzz Hausner) ([Leica] 75mm F/2 M lens?)