Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] leica digital back-initial test results
From: feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli)
Date: Sun Apr 10 09:40:47 2005
References: <01bc01c53dc8$ca58fbf0$6701a8c0@ccapr.com>

I agree. Unless you already have a lot of money invested in R gear, it's
not a cost effective choice. Maybe we'll get lucky and Leica will cram 
the
DMR guts into an  R10-D body at a lower price.

feli

On Apr 10, 2005, at 5:28 AM, B. D. Colen wrote:

> IF it does behave like a somewhat lower res MF back; and IF it produces
> the image quality the post says it does, then for professionals who 
> NEED
> the image quality, don't need or want autofocus, and who have a major
> investment in R equipment, it may indeed be worth the cost. For anyone
> else who needs to even think before writing a check, it's over priced.
> Because given the uses to which most camera owners put their images, 
> the
> image quality difference will not be apparent.
________________________________________________________
feli2@earthlink.net                     2 + 2 = 4                      
www.elanphotos.com


Replies: Reply from masonster at gmail.com (David Mason) ([Leica] leica digital back-initial test results)
Reply from telyt at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] leica digital back-initial test results)
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] leica digital back-initial test results)