Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica Article in LA Times
From: leicanikon at earthlink.net (Stephen Gandy)
Date: Mon Apr 25 08:26:54 2005

There is a small Leica article in the LA times today, April 25, 2005
www.latimes.com

you have to register to see the article,
a seldom used address from hotmail or yahoo might be a good idea to
avoid spam

the article talks about a stock split, and hard financial times as Leica
adjusts to the digital marketplace.   According to the article, Hermes
is advocating a spin off of  Leica's "digital partnership with Panasonic
of Japan"  (a bad idea in my opinion).

I believe Leica's real troubled started when the Leitz family sold Leica
decades ago, giving control of the company to bean counters who never
completely understood Leica's products or Leica's devoted customers.
Unfortunately the bean counters only excel at beating their chests
proclaiming how great the product is (they would do the same MBA
standard rhetoric if the same execs were running, say a fashion scarf
company).  The problem for decades is fundamentally that the Leica Board
of Directors simply does not know what products to bring out,  what
product improvements need to be made,  or what products to stop
production on to cut losses, simply because the Board is not comprised
of Leica photographers. Worse, the Board does not see its own
shortcoming because of overwhelming pride.   I believe Leica can be not
only fixed, but brought into continued profitability.  But that won't
happen until professional Leica photographers are making the product
line and marketing decisions, not bean counters.

Stephen Gandy





Replies: Reply from jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] Leica Article in LA Times)
Reply from msmall at infionline.net (Marc James Small) ([Leica] The Economics of Leica)
Reply from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Leica Article in LA Times)