Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] More Tulips
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Sat May 21 01:54:14 2005

What I like about these classic lenses is that they are not perfect.
They seem to do something with the colours: they're always just a tad off,
or they seem to "soften" the colours.
They have a slight flare: a submini David Hamilton effect.
They're sharp, but not as sharp as nowadays, and not neceserally everywhere.
All these slight imperfections make them very human IMO.

So thanks for showing,
Philippe 


> From: Jim Nichols <nicholsj@edge.net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 17:32:49 -0500
> To: "LUG@Leica-Users.org" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Subject: [Leica] More Tulips
> 
> As I try to satisfy my Leica "fix" on a retiree's budget, I have tried to 
> find
> gems from the past that can save me a few bucks.  After trying a Steinheil
> Culminar 85mm/2.8 in Exacta mount that I got from John Heinz, I purchased a
> similar lens in LTM and have just finished my first roll of color shot with
> it.  While I don't claim it to be the equal of modern Leica glass, it is no
> slouch.  I posted several spring flower shots yesterday, and will add a new
> one as well as a repeat.
> 
> Any comments will be appreciated, good or bad.
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/Musings/Yellow_Tulips01a
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/Musings/Tulips01
> 
> 
> 
> Jim Nichols
> nicholsj@edge.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from nicholsj at edge.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] More Tulips)