Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:Leica quality
From: ruben at rhodos.dk (Ruben)
Date: Wed May 25 16:04:59 2005
References: <200505252156.j4PLonTx066160@server1.waverley.reid.org> <4294FB77.6070703@telefonica.net>

I might considder one for my gx 680 - though handheld is out off the 
question at 66 secs it will be fine for shoting tabletop and art/paintings 
etc.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "F?lix L?pez de Maturana" <FELIXMATURANA@telefonica.net>
To: <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 12:25 AM
Subject: [Leica] Re:Leica quality


> >If you intend to do decent digital repro work from paintings, or 
> >photograph any other static subjects, something like the Betterlight 
> >backs is the way to go. They start out less expensive than a Canon 1ds Mk 
> >II, and they go well beyond what Valeo, Phase One or Sinar can produce 
> >with their 22mp backs.
>>
>>18 to 140mp, with file sizes up to 1.7Gb.
>>
>>http://www.betterlight.com/products4X5.asp
>
>
> Thanks Henning
>
> Perhaps this may awake up to life old Linhof in digital way.
>
> Regards
>
> Felix
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 


In reply to: Message from FELIXMATURANA at telefonica.net (Félix López de Maturana) ([Leica] Re:Leica quality)