Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I am with Luis on this one. I have never understood the attraction of the likes of Lomo, Lensbaby, Holga etc. If someone needs to use inferior equipment for economic reasons, that's one thing (and many great images have been produced by people in this category). But deliberately using what amounts to a Coke bottle bottom to make pictures and then claiming it to be ART or whatever, well... Suffice it to say that the Lomo will not be missed here. Nathan Luis Miguel Casta?eda wrote: > > On 27 de may de 2005, at 15:22, Douglas Sharp wrote: > >> In the latest issue of "Fotomagazin" (Germany) there is an article >> announcing the demise of the LOMO. > > > crap camera keeped afloat by the lomography trend made it to raise its > price off limits of the reasonable price tag. Cheapness was the main > reason to be. DEP. > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > -- Nathan Wajsman Almere, The Netherlands General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com Stock photography: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman http://myloupe.com/home/found_photographer.php?photographer=507 Prints for sale: http://www.photodeluge.com