Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bonjour Didier, plutot Bonsoir This is a good idea, I have some recent pictures with the Lux to post, IMO the negative aspects are at full aperture low overall contrast and vigneting, at F2 is better but it think Summicron is better, up to 2,8 I don't appreciate differences, except on the flare, recently I've take some pictures with the Lux and I appreciate some reflections. I always have a UV filter, I ask me if maybe with the Lux this can cause the flare, as you know the hood and the system to put the filters on the Lux and on the Cron are different, on the Cron is E39, on the Lux is S7 on the hood. Anyway I think that the only serious way to compare both is with a tripod, the same picture and the same aperture. Next week end I want to do the experiment and show to the LUG. Saludos cordiales desde Barcelona Luis -----Mensaje original----- De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org]En nombre de Didier Ludwig Enviado el: domingo, 29 de mayo de 2005 20:20 Para: Leica Users Group Asunto: Re: [Leica] Summilux M 1,4/35 PRE ASPH deception Luis I do not have any of the mentioned lenses, but I am interested in either the 35 pre-asph 'lux and 35 pre-asph 'cron. It would be very interesting to see comparisons shots between them - do you have any to post? TIA Didier >Some nonths ago I've purchased a Summilux M 1,4/35mm in excellent condition >S.N. 3253xxx. When I compare with my Summicron 2/35mm, SN 3639xxx, or with >my Summilux 1,4/50mm SN 1897xxx I appreciate: > >Compared with Summicron 35 it is less sharp and contrasted. Up to stop 5,6 >are the same > >Compared with Lux 50, I find too is less contrasted and sharp, and the bokeh >is not the same. _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information