Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots
From: creativevisions at verizon.net (Michael J Herring)
Date: Sat Jun 4 00:17:18 2005
References: <6.1.2.0.2.20050603182251.052b89b0@mail.comporium.net> <009901c5688d$e48a1820$129477d9@siscad.com> <4dccee3d05060315591fdcce03@mail.gmail.com> <6.1.2.0.2.20050603203439.05371e10@mail.comporium.net> <4dccee3d050603174112b816da@mail.gmail.com> <004d01c568ab$44817bc0$1ae76c18@ted>

Ted, I won't thrash you. Iguess you are not a computer geek as many of us
are.
(Whether we care to admit this or not).
I, for one, find this information extremely useful and interesting.
I also log this type of information when working in the darkroom.

Now, if they could come up with a method for automatically logging the
darkroom work!

Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@shaw.ca>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 10:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots


> David Mason offered:
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots
>
>
>> Well, it gives what data it can - but it certainly isn't telling us
>> the lens type, and aperture - just as I thought. So it would be
>> incomplete at best from the canon.<<<<<<<,,
>
> Guys and gals I know I'm about to ask a completely inane stupid question
> and undoubtedly there will be a million answers back why one needs it.
> This recorded information.
>
> But here goes:
>
> I can't for the life of me understand what the heck you'd ever need to
> know what lens, aperture and other miscellaneous information not being
> read camera to camera?
>
> Isn't the whole action of taking pictures about the final photograph and
> how well you shot it? Surely these other details can't have much meaning
> for anything of logic in how good the end product is going to be? Or
was.
>
> I know people want to know what lens, aperture etc were used right here
on
> the list, but the question is some times asked when it's a mere happy
snap
> of no meaning.
>
> Now if there's a specific effect, say blurred action of runners in a
race
> and there's a beautiful effect of speed, then yes knowing what the
shutter
> speed was can be helpful, if the asking person is going to try this
> effect. I have no problem with this because that's how we learn.
>
> But having it recorded with the shot is like.... "Who cares? I'd be far
> more interested in knowing it was a damn fine photograph than "what lens
> was recorded."
>
> OK now all together, thrash me! ;-)
>
> ted
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 371 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!



Replies: Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots)
In reply to: Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots)
Message from pwerner at bluewin.ch (Peter Werner) ([Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots)
Message from masonster at gmail.com (David Mason) ([Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots)
Message from masonster at gmail.com (David Mason) ([Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots)