Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark will no doubt be happy to hear that I have just bought another Leica lens, a 50mm Summilux R (no, not the latest version, I do not have that kind of money to blow on a 50mm lens) for use with my Canon DSLR -- Canon does not have an L lens in that focal length, and I find the non-L Canon 50/1.4 that I have a bit too flimsy for my taste. Another Stephen Gandy adapter is on its way to me. In general, in the past 2-3 months there has been a veritable explosion of interest in Leica (and some Zeiss) glass on the Fred Miranda Canon forum. And it is not just migrating users like me who are using R glass on DSLRs; several people who have never owned Leica stuff are actually buying R lenses to use on their Canons. Maybe this is after they saw some of the 100mm Apo Macro shots I posted ;-) In any event, I hope that Leica is aware of this trend (if it is indeed a trend). It certainly is in keeping with my own opinion that Leica would be a lot better off if they dumped the bodies (certainly on the R side) and concentrated on the lenses. If several Canon users are willing to spend the money on R glass and go through the hazzle of locating and buying adapters to use that glass, then why not make it easier for them and make a line of R lenses in Canon, Nikon etc. mounts? The lenses would still be purely mechanical, but at least the need for an adapter would be eliminated and Leica might realize some incremental revenue and margin. Nathan Nathan Wajsman Almere, Netherlands http://www.nathanfoto.com http://www.fotosevilla.com Print sales: http://www.photodeluge.com Image licensing: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman