Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: Portraits
From: abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Mon Jun 20 08:45:16 2005
References: <1A34407A-B7A6-4C75-9233-9D2C2059771F@charter.net> <42B65BC5.7020805@adrenaline.com>
 
It failed the "Is it photography or is it graphic arts?" test for me,
too. Kyle has been pushing this boundary also so while his images are
striking they leave me with a clinical detachment. Surely it's art but
it's not what I would call photography in the strictest of terms. It
is something else.

Adam

On 6/19/05, Scott McLoughlin <scott@adrenaline.com> wrote:
> Sometimes (sometimes), I'm impressed by this processed-heavy
> stuff, but I don't know how to interpret it.  A big part is probably that
> I just can't go there myself - I just don't have any graphic design
> skills to
> speak off.
>
> > http://www.lisaroze.com/
In reply to: Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] OT: Portraits)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] OT: Portraits)